The Masculine Gay Male is a Fraud

Spread the love

Originally posted 2013-10-19 23:47:37.

A random and I must admit mischievous Google search—the masculine gay male is a fraud—really turned into an eye-opener for me.  I was just amazed how many people in the West seem to have bought into this crap. But where did this idea come from?

In fact there is no evidence of the  ‘masculine gayness’ trope prior to 1948 and Kinsey’s publication of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. This purported to be a groundbreaking, seminal work that would correct thousands of years of misapprehensions. The problems with it were twofold: in the first place there were all those thousands of years.  And in the second, Kinsey’s method was more than questionable: it set out to prove his a priori ideas. That is not how we do science.

Kinsey postulated that all men who had intimate relationships with other males were ‘homosexual.’ But that was not the definition used by every other serious researcher. For them, Homosexuals exhibited a particular personality type. This was partly reflected in morphology — they tended to be slight, almost girlish and in psychology — they were strongly feminised. They did exhibit a powerful preference for anal sex in which they were the recipients, but this seemed more a consequence than a cause.

As a result of Kinsey, who was a masterful self-publicist, the modern New Ga Man came into being but note only in the West. Everywhere else, Homosexuals remained cute girly-boys.

sammy and friend

The other problem with Kinsey is that he insisted that both parties in an encounter between two males must be Homosexuals, which was nonsensical. Homosexuals, in every previous description, desired big, powerful masculine males, definitely not others like themselves.

So instead of male intimacy reflecting the male-female form, in which one party was the submissive girl and the other the dominant man, a weird, narcissistic ‘like with like’ model appeared, which I call the New Gay Man. This is a form of Auto-erotic fetish in fact Autoandrophilia, in which naturally submissive feminine males attempt — usually unsuccessfully — to perform masculinity.

Again, however, this only happened in the West and in certain Westernised enclaves elsewhere. Everywhere else, the older model, which I call the Roman, persist.

Travelling

These days I spend a much time travelling. I really love southeast Asia and have a lot of friends there now. Quite a few of those friends are gay, but they’re not gay like these ‘masculine’ Western gays. They’re girls really, who just look like guys. A fair few even used to be girls, but age got them and they retired. They sure don’t act like guys. So it’s fine; I’m not attracted to them, and if they’re attracted to me, which clearly some are, then that’s fine too. Flattering. But essentially I relate to them as non-sexual-target women. Sort of like your wife’s sister except with a beard. Or maybe your wife’s sister does have a beard…sorry, if she does. But you get the drift.

These girls probably think they’re masculine.

So the result of my Google search was enlightening. The Interwebz is, apparently, full of gay males who are so obsessed with acting masculine that they actually condemn the girly gay guys, like they were letting the side down. In fact, they are so vocal you can hardly find any of the girlyboys sticking up for themselves. But maybe that’s because they can’t get their computer thingy to work/are too busy on FaceBook/their nails need doing. Or some other perfectly normal girly stuff—like not pretending to be a fucking welder, or for that matter, a guy.

These manly-man gay guys want to be girls in bed but act all masculine and macho outside. So they learn the tricks that they need to perform to appear to be masculine men.

Gender is innate, remember?

The trouble is, men don’t learn these tricks. We just know them; fuck it, we invented them.  For us, masculine behaviour is not learned but natural. It flows from our sense of self as men, from our gender. Sure, it is conditioned by the society we develop in, but we created the mores which govern that society, or at least our forebears did. We do not study other men’s behaviour specifically to learn it—which, according to their websites, is exactly what these ‘masculine gay’ men do. Of course, they have to; in fact they’re about as masculine as a panty-liner, so they have to learn how to put on the act.

nude bakla
These are what gays look like everywhere sane: girls.

You do have to remember, from time to time, that this ‘masculine gay’ thing is under eighty years old. It was all invented by Alfred Kinsey in 1948, and here’s a thing: it only applies in the West. Sure the Greeks buggered boys, but there was no question who was the guy and who was the girl in their relationships. A boy was a girl till she could grow a full beard, then she turned into a man who got a boy of his own to bugger. In fact, till Kinsey fucked it all up, the idea of ‘masculine homosexual man’ was a simple oxymoron — which it still is, everywhere outside the Benighted West. So ‘masculine’ gays have had to invent for themselves a whole construct of social interaction in very short order.

But why do they do it? Are there really masculine, manly, straight men who are sexually attracted to other manly, masculine straight men? Or, as seems far more likely, is there a deal of economy with the truth going on here? Well if those masculine manly men who want to be fucked by other masculine manly men do exist, they’re not Homosexuals, because they don’t fit the personality type as established by, for example Greenspan & Campbell.

femboy
A cute femboy from the Philippines. Masculine she is not.

Gaybros

The can call themselves what they like—gaybros, whatever—it doesn’t matter. As one correspondent of mine, herself  a ‘gay’ male, who dropped the pseudo-masculine act and began performing femininity instead,  when she finally realised the sheer stupidity of the lie she was living and is much happier for it, said, ‘Gay men are women pretending to be men in order to have sex with other women pretending to be men.’

Furthermore, all of these gays actually want a regular masculine man themselves; ask them, it’s true. To be blunt, they want to be anally penetrated by one; they adore it. They’re really just another variant on a familiar theme, the male cock-hound, but they are desperate—and will do anything—to appear to be masculine men. It’s this dishonesty that is perhaps most repellent. In cultures like Southeast Asia, nobody cares if you’re a gay; but they get irritated if you are a gay who pretends not to be. They might call you a ‘macho gay,’ a pa-man or a paminta. They know what you are.

In the West, post Kinsey, the masculine gay male, the New Gay Man, looks down his noses at the girly-boys. He hates them for having the temerity to do what he would like to but lacks the courage. And, heaven forfend, transsexuals must seem utterly pointless to them. I mean, why take a potentially serviceable male body that could fuck them in the arse and turn it into something that couldn’t and they wouldn’t ever want to anyway? Makes no sense, does it? As ever, everything is reduced to the lowest common denominator—the arse full of cock. At least the femboys are refreshingly honest—it’s clear what they want, they make no secret of it.

‘Mine’s a big one, Daddy and make it stiff — none of that limp noodle crap.’

Ladyboy Pinky
She lives for cock. She knows she’s not a woman, but she sees no reason not to use the same techniques to seduce men.

The lie of the Masculine Gay Male

But it’s worse even than that, because our ‘masculine gay male’ Lotharios are terrified that if they’re associated with effeminate gays, (that is, the honest, down to earth Homosexuals) then they might lose all the non-existent ‘male privilege’ they’ve worked so hard for—and it must indeed have been such hard work for the poor dears. So these gays are, often, themselves homophobic and frequently transphobic too. They only support other gays who look and act like ‘real’ men. Sort of. Nothing more absurd could be imagined.

I know you want what I’m sitting on. Don’t be shy.

The funny thing is, for all their bombast and high ideals of masculinity, they have been emasculated and integrated, to be tolerated as long as they conform to the rules they themselves locked themselves into, and the one rule they must never, ever, break, is that they must always appear to behave like men.

One flamboyant little ladyboy in her high-heels and make-up,  is far more disruptive, politically effective and challenging than legions of these lapdogs.

And that must really, really, sting.

Terisa
See?

Leave a Reply

Buy Me A Coffee
Thank you for visiting. You can now buy me a coffee!